The pandemic was a world-changing event, transforming whole industries and bringing new habits to society and the work world. One of the most important changes in the popularity of remote work and a new model of operating for countless companies around the world.
Yet it would be foolish to assume that the pandemic is the last unpredictable event to occur. There are numerous other factors that will make the future even more uncertain. Starting from the climate changes to increasing inequalities – the future of work is undoubtedly changing and interesting. And what’s even more certain – the experiences gathered throughout the pandemic lockdowns will not go unnoticed.
According to the McKinsey reports, the pandemic has significantly accelerated the trends and changes that have been visible before the pandemic. Remote work is one of the best examples.
The European Commission research indicates that no more than 4% of the EU-based workforce has ever worked remotely before the pandemic. This includes not only remote work regularly, but even one day working from home (or any location other than the office or an employer-forced place). With the lockdowns, up to 40% of the whole European workforce has switched to remote work.
But the switch to remote working was not only a forced social experiment on an unprecedented scale. It was also a battle-test of the idea of working from home and getting rid of the offices. Apart from the uncertainty of letting the employees work with slightly less supervision, companies noticed that telework is a great way to find savings unseen before.
The Statista data indicates that approximately 47% of companies are willing to downsize the owned office space, with 5% of surveyed companies willing to reduce up to 71% of the owned space.
This comes with no surprise, as up to 40% of desks were unoccupied before the COVID-19 pandemic, and an additional 10-30% of all desks remaining unoccupied due to the result of the pandemic. Thus, keeping the offices with nearly 80% of desks unused would be a huge waste of money – the rental costs, media, and maintenance would be paid for empty rooms.
Apparently, remote work is profitable for employees also – up to 90% of Gen Zs (people born between 1997 and 2012) and Millenials (1981-1996) are not willing to return to the office full time. Only 10% of them are willing to get back to the office full time.
Working from home comes with multiple advantages – the employee needs not to commute, can abandon the dress code, or achieve a greater work-life balance. With an increasing share of these two generations in the global workforce, the remote and hybrid workforce is here to stay for good and bad. The work-from-home future appears to be bright.
But it doesn’t mean it will be easy to adopt it when not knowing how to do that.
While there is no clear and widely accepted hybrid or partly remote work definition, there can be three basic models enlisted:
While the names are pretty self-descriptive, it is worthy to deliver a slight commentary on each.
In the remote-first model the company is managed and organized in a way that makes the physical appearance of the employee irrelevant, assuming one is doing his or her job. In this model the employer is not even interested in the employee’s physical position – one can work from home, from the cafe, from a hotel in another country, or any place imaginable, assuming there is access to the tools one needs.
This makes the model available for high-tech companies that are largely independent of their physical location and get their profits from digital services.
Although the term “balanced” suggests there is some kind of imbalance in other models, this refers to the fact that there is no dominant element of the work. The employees can work either from the office or from their homes or any other location.
In this model, the company encourages employees to go to the office on a regular basis, for example for at least one day every week. It can be either up to an employee's decision or regulated by the company policy (like Monday Meetings for example).
This model doesn’t differ significantly from what has been seen before the COVID-19 pandemic, bringing all the advantages of working from the office. The employees get their desks, their working stations, and the opportunity to socialize in shared spaces. The meetings are held in conference rooms and all the office vibe is kept. The company needs to maintain the office, yet there is usually nearly a full headcount in the office at present, so it is not an issue.
The remote work is available at will, yet the employees are discouraged from overuse it. This can be either included in the company policy or regulated by custom. Having a one-day remote is a good example of how it can look like.
No matter which model the company will choose, there is a set of good practices to follow to avoid confusion. By following them, the company and the management avoid multiple pitfalls that can hamper even the most promising remote transformation.
Following clear rules is the core of the remote-friendly environment. The rules need to apply to various aspects of the work that are considered clear and intuitive when it comes to working from the office. This includes:
Depending on the company’s industry and culture, there can be multiple other rules to set to avoid confusion among both the employees and the management.
The company may claim to be flexible and modern, yet if the management team is in the office on a daily basis, the rest of the team will feel the pressure to be present as well. And by that, the company will not witness the full synergies and benefits of going remote.
A clear set of rules can be helpful to solve this situation, but in the end, it is the purpose of the leaders to give the best example.
On the other side of the same coin, the company needs to be extremely clear about performance and recognition. If there is a significant shift toward the office-centric team, the overall morale would be hurt. Also, making the unofficial preferences toward one way of working is against the rules that need to be not only established but also applicable to all of the employees, no matter if it is a manager or an intern.
Last but not least, if the company wants to go remote and get all the benefits and synergies, it is crucial to keep everything transparent. What does “transparent” mean exactly? Again, a clear set of rules applying to every employee and visibility of all the key performance indicators.
Time and attendance tracking are one of the simplest and best-performing ways to increase transparency in the company. When knowing how many times one was working, when and on what project, the company can make more informed decisions. When compared with the overall productivity of the employees it is easiest to spot the stars and promote the best ones.
The shift toward remote work is here to stay, probably forever. Companies can either try to stop the change or follow it and get what’s best. With the guide above, it is much easier and more efficient to maximize the outcome of the remote-centric shift and avoid what’s harmful.
Discover more about the topic on our HR blog. And if you wish to talk more about the benefits of remote work and how time tracking can deliver the advantages, don’t hesitate to contact us now!
Holidays are a time to take a break from teaching and modernize how the administration works to enter the following year with more efficient solutions. Moving with the times, schools and universities more often decide to implement modern software for employee time tracking and leave management. Chec
If you're a startup founder or small business owner, your primary focus will be on growing your product or service team first instead of HR, which can be costly. But is it possible to run a business without HR?
The problematic situation in the market and high inflation didn't stop our team from achieving goals. Calamari has been appreciated in Poland and around the world by our clients and experienced people from the business world.
Get monthly insights and make HR simple with us
